User blog comment:Annamisasa/The 102nd Annual Hunger Games/@comment-7317707-20131018032653/@comment-5082922-20131018213330

^Last comment was by me.

Another case scenario could be a games where "Bob" and "John" makes it to the final day. Bob's sponsor begins to write comment such as "BOB IS SO GONNA DIE! ;_;". The gamemaker can now either kill Bob in the final battle and have Bob's mentor think: "Ugh, he's so predictable." OR he can let John die and have John's mentor tell him: "Ugh, you let yourself be manipulated, it's not fair!" Or, the gamemaker may have planned to kill them both, having no victor, in which case both will say: "LAAAAME! I WOULD RATHER WANT MY TRIBUTE TO GET 2ND RUNNER UP THAN DYING BOTH!" and then claim that the gamemaker only did it because of Bob's Sponsor's comment.

So to avoid these comments, I will simply look upon comment such as "My own tribute is gonna die ;-;" as an invitation to kill them. But you're right about the manipulation thing, Lightstone, so I won't regard "This tribute is not gonna die ;-;" with as much strike back.